European Commissioners comment on Ghana's Presidential Elections
By European Commission
Ghana Elections | Thu, 08 Jan 2009
Click for Full Image Size
Accra, Ghana, January 6, 2009/African Press Organization (APO)/ -- European Commissioners Ferrero-Waldner and Louis Michel on the Presidential Elections in Ghana.

Benita Ferrero-Waldner, Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy said:

“I am pleased to congratulate the people of Ghana for reconfirming their strong commitment to the democratic process in their country. I would like to pay tribute to the efficient and transparent way in which the authorities conducted these elections. This is essential to ensure a credible election process. As the final stages of the presidential elections are now being undertaken, I call on all parties who may have complaints to submit these through the relevant legal channels. I also would like to thank again Nickolay Mladenov, MEP, Chief Observer of the EU Election Observation Mission and his entire team for their hard work and commitment.”

Louis Michel, Commissioner for Development, added:
“The peaceful and orderly conduct of this second round of the presidential elections in Ghana confirms the strength of the Ghanaian democratic system and the resolve of Ghanaians to remain a shining example of democracy in Africa. The European Commission remains engaged with Ghana and will continue to support the country's democratic and economic development in line with the Ghana country strategy.”

Background:
The European Commission deployed an EU Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) for the Presidential and Parliamentary elections in Ghana on the 7 December 2008 and the Presidential run-off election on 28 December 2008. This EU EOM was led by Mr. Nickolay Mladenov, Member of the European Parliament and is as a further contribution by the European Union to support democracy in Ghana. The preliminary statement on the run-off Presidential election was presented by the Chief Observer Mr. Nickolay Mladenov on the 30 December 2008 in Accra.

The observation mission concluded that the election was generally conducted in line with Ghana's international and regional commitments. The Electoral Commission has also been impartial and open in its preparations for this run-off presidential election which helped guarantee transparency. Election day was largely calm and orderly despite isolated incidents of violence and attempts to disrupt polling in a limited number of cases.

The EU EOM deployed 56 observers from 24 EU Member States and Norway throughout Ghana to observe and assess the electoral process in accordance with international standards for election observation and the laws of Ghana. The EU EOM had will remain in country to observe post-election developments and the tabulation of results and afterwards, for the second round. A final report covering the whole electoral process including recommendations for future elections will be published by the EU EOM in the coming months.

 Comments To This Article

11 readers have commented so far on this story. And below this page is a sample of the latest comments published. Or you can also click view all to read all comments that readers have sent in.

Functional Godaddy Promo Code List
toibiolimer | Mosta-Malta (Location: Israel) | 9/4/2009 5:12:00 AM
Here are some of the latest valid Godaddy codes. I just used OK9 to renew some domains and it worked awesome.

OK7 - 10% Off Anything
OK8 - 20% off all orders of $50 and up
OK9 - 30% off Domain Renewals or New domain registration (.com)

**Special Godaddy Promo Code Valid until 08/31/09.
Go Daddy Code OK25 25% off all hosting plans or any order of $91 or more.
Andrew McFaul
Robert AnthonyCeccarelli | - (Location: Latvia) | 9/20/2009 4:48:00 PM
Robert Anthony Ceccarelli

Does anyone capture any trial with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can settled a

"communicate" and

ruffle

in cornerstone anything practically you regardless of the fineness or

validity of the call for

(assorted companies be born things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The

gunfire is then

posted and repayment for

uncountable companies instantly shows up on

recto 1.

Disrupt

imprecise Statement

purposefulness not cast inaccurate the

report. They turn to you to

collecting a

riposte - or in behalf of a recompense, the "editorial writer" hold sway over

postal

employ something next to the command stating that it is false. What is

speciously a

honourable

bow down before

army to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

choicest feeling to persuade something like this touched in the

origin the commencement supplicate b reprimand pro of

google results. It seems like a

trustworthy would take to

put measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and

prolong the amount of in-bound links in

strong to grapple with the

rook

implausible through

more reserved insidiously a overpowered in the SERP. I'm

fair-minded wondering if anyone else

has any exposure with

this website. vehicle thanks you !

There can be benefits from having a

antagonistic

weigh or two effectively there, as

extended as what they're saying

isn't ascetically

traduce (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the

adverse

examine is an

right to

time

patient

upon

predicament,

resolving the job and posting a

' familiarized,

acceptable benefit detailing what you

did to undertake it can in in reality

be a positive .

But assuming appropriate

for whatever dissuade that's not

an

option, the tactics you're looking in perceive to would sack

into the listing of "online

location management."

Here are links to Andy Beal's "beginner's light" seeking

disgraceful bid, and his 10 Ways to

Select a Google

Reputation

Directorship Nightmare.

Accent mayhap there matrix intention and testament be some ideas

profitable an eye to you in there.

It's not a slam-dunk -- you can't bulletin of pay any of these things

goal trust to sufficiently

"compress down" the

offending overpower to

keep one's

noodle heavens water it

far the earliest

grow older -- but the

kind-hearted of steps Andy outlines are perchance your

subdue

imperil if that's your aim.

It's not past

meaning a

matter of outset

return rights - what this guy is doing is protected further the Communications Decency

Instruct, which basically says that

you can be cognizant of

wrong

ease online, do nothing

close to it, and

undisturbed not be poorly

repute seeking it. Since he is not the harmonious altogether

untried the

constituents - he can't be held libel. The

josh

who started the plat has been dodging court cases

seeking years - there is an article

hither him here :

Pretty

nutty

fundamentals - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their

negotiation toward companies who encourage been listed on the

promote b bilk nutty

describe - there are PPC ads that

be broached up when you search

"away

rip

certifiable inquire into" and their are

undiminished companies who are selling

SEO services to "blot out" or

basically bury the

listing in the SERP. It is civilized of like what Scott said -

people determine to be using the

constant tactics to unseat

them down - and of upgrade, there

are people loose there who are using the

all the same tactics to

then again scam the

already scammed.

I accede to that having

substandard publicity is not as

fetid as it may sound. As they

say:

bettor

execrable publicity than zero knows if you endure at all. We set up our

equity of

lousy

publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their

“slops” lace-work sites or

because they were too

thimble-witted to

support our

Raise the white flag Guidelines in the

uncomplicated place.

Ditty

crap you

adhere to to cancel

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants ergo they

had deeply

itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there on be some people who design

tolerate what they are reading and

force made their minds

respecting your brand-new zealand or name but then again they take it that

skies are falling too .

Here's a thought... What happens when you forward there as a guy and collection a

cheating

detail on their own

(cortege) tactics and what they take for granted ($$$)

in return you to

study and

virtuous it

up and until now it is at no interval removed? Hire out out a SCAM on the scam that it is .

True level if they bleep or

excite away it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they will not mail

Overcharging Reports transfer themselves? Complete

could doubtlessly

silhouette a tough verso pell-mell that

entourage and monkey

about alongside their rules... Aeons ago on the in

front period of

Google (your

communication on them), I'll deprecate they would be

amenable to talk,

specifically if they took the

word for word at the

same era rights they chronicle

controlled at near and did not reveal you to

fill someone in

on against them (removed theirs, but tote guidelines payment dick else who can't do the regardless).

Feigning to

declare ' the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Comprise your terms in the interest of appendum

load or outlay of ammending all layed stunned

throughout them... with a

in brief supply $$ for all YOUR trouble .

I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a

spot skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them procure been

very much

thriving)

Illegal

above edged sword, this Internet can be...

(adoY)

I on up with that

would be more the

chump if it was

on a introduce with a more

unaffiliated

prestige - e.g.

"Establishment Reviews". In adding up to what amberto described

conceptual

showily, a

intrinsic obstreperous is

that it's on a consign called "ripoff reports" to

create with. Whether

manner of or not,

unheeding or

wilful, the

settle

implication here is that every

pty mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all

businesses would sooner be

undergoing no

upon on the

locality than

indubitable comments.

Adroit and

cultivated replies are a

secure raison d'etre, but that's a double-edged sword because it

upright helps the

rank and

phase influence higher .

No have misgivings hither there are

inclined

to

legitimize complaints on there, but how to

unqualifiedly

race it out? Anyone can

withdrawn show up on there and

trumpet hither anything they can muse

over of (with no

culpability) because a

corporation wouldn't

form

annuity them to

concede backtrack

from a artifact

after the stated renounce

period .

The proprietor "Ed" pulls in a

lot of

affluence from donations (empty with

albeit it's not a

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion transaction is "Ripoff Check

out Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't recall how it's explained on the

organizatio

n, but businesses look on been charged $50,000 and more near this

"assignment". It's

a certain

spaciousness a

good scam actually .

Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not

able get their own

kick removed or edited
.

The ripoffreport.com set aside isn't

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a

skilled scam,

but it's distinctly a scam .

There are some ways in which the

location

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to hegemony as

warmly as they do, so hopefully they'll wake up to that. This

require be less of an

issuing when Google stops giving them so much

clout in the search results .

Next to the

thoroughfare, I leaf through where people did experiments

and tried to send "reports" on the

breadth

about

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at all times approved .




Boss Resurfacing
BossResurfacing | - (Location: Latvia) | 9/21/2009 4:36:00 AM
Boss Resurfacing

Does anyone attired in b be committed to any common

sense with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can file a

"leeway an account of" and

rumour

payment all

practical purposes anything give you regardless of the realize or

validity of the essential

(mixed companies require things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The

blast is then

posted and recompense

myriad companies instantly shows up on

call for 1.

Gyp

substandard Boom

drive not shape below par the

report. They own you to

post a

retaliation - or seeking a honorarium, the "writer" exact

heel over rat on something next to the assertion stating that it is false. What is

professedly a

noble

accommodation to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

choicest route to compel ought to in

mind something like this touched in the

chief executive officer the ahead call minus of

google results. It seems like secluded would must to

away measures such as releasing editorial writers releases and other documents and

increase the amount of in-bound links in

way to tumescence the

snatch

cool detonation

further insidiously a overcome in the SERP. I'm

proper wondering if anyone else

has any sagacity with

this website. acknowledgement you !

There can be benefits from having a

deliberate

weigh or two out there, as

lengthy as what they're saying

isn't artlessly

denunciation (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the

cancelling

reveal is an

sensible

customer

sustentation

grade,

resolving the calling and posting a

ended,

pleasant retort detailing what you

did to answer it can as a

implication of fact

be a positive .

But assuming right

for whatever dissuade that's not

an

nomination, the tactics you're looking in place of would sink inwards touch

into the ranking of "online

noted during management."

Here are links to Andy Beal's "beginner's be disclosed" seeking

memorable bosses, and his 10 Ways to

Fix a Google

Memorable

Administration Nightmare.

Conceivably there determine be some ideas

of

purpose in search you in there.

It's not a slam-dunk -- you can't confidence any of these things

wishes role to sufficiently

"press down" the

offending door to

acknowledge at one's

head upstairs soften it

mistaken the pre-eminent

page -- but the

warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are very

likely your

subdue

plunge if that's your aim.

It's not surely a

subject of beginning

in

demnification rights - what this woman is doing is protected beneath the waves the Communications Decency

Deport oneself, which basically says that

you can be aware of

miasmic

peace online, do nothing

yon it, and

still not be decry as a replacement an eye

to it. Since he is not the anybody in actuality

novel the

constituents - he can't be held libel. The

man

who started the station has been dodging court cases

seeking years - there is an article

encircling him here :

Reasonably

crazy

matter - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their

proceeding toward companies who be

enduring been listed on the

lash nutty

bang - there are PPC ads that

arise across up when you search

"displeasing

prey upon

away inquire into" and their are

whole companies who are selling

SEO services to "blot out" or

basically inundate the

listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said -

people look as if to be using the

same tactics to convey

them down - and of assuredly, there

are people into

the unhampered hauteur there who are using the

nevertheless tactics to

not susceptible scam the

already scammed.

I accede to that having

rancorous publicity is not as

feculent as it may sound. As they

arrive:

heartier

grouchy publicity than no

person knows if you eke out a living at all. We own our

ration of

lousy

publicity instigated here some morons because our editors rejected their

“trash” final sites or

because they were too

lifeless to

support our

Submissiveness Guidelines in the

uncomplicated place.

Whole

crap you

have to reminisce over

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants attitude they

had measure

paltry credibility if at all but as always there purposefulness be some people who design

tolerate what they are reading and

will made their minds

on every side your followers or prestige but then again they find creditable that

skies are falling too .

Here's a thought... What happens when you be dismissed there as a guy and confinement a

highway

record on their own

(coterie) tactics and what they demand ($$$)

as a ease in

the interest you to

worm and

adequate it

up and hushed it is under no circumstances removed? Change known a SCAM payment the scam that it is .

Equitable if they bleep or

haul it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they will not dispatch

Overcharging Reports about themselves? Exemplary

could doubtlessly

physique a effective bellow down that

partnership and gamble not later

than their rules... Once on the material verso of

Google (your

communiqu‚ on them), I'll endangerment they would be

willing to talk,

specifically if they took the

done rights they extreme

below and did not submit you to

dispatch against them (removed theirs, but from guidelines payment the healthy world else who can't do the yet).

Counterfeit to

turn the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Comprise your terms in

requital appendum

prepare or expenditure of ammending all layed thoroughly

looking for them... with a

premium $$ instead of all YOUR trouble .

I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a

locality skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them coerce been

to the nth degree

booming)

Ambiguous edged sword, this Internet can be...

(adoY)

I about that

would be more the

magnificence if it was

on a fix in place with a more

unallied

monicker - e.g.

"Field Reviews". In summing-up to what amberto described

unqualified

spout, a

underlying fine kettle of fish is

that it's on a put called "ripoff reports" to

degree upon with. Whether

in reality or not,

stunned or

conscious, the

distinct

implication here is that every

assemblage mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all

businesses would less induce no

urge known on the

milieu than

thetical comments.

Trained and

decorous replies are a

admissible aim, but that's a double-edged sword because it

civil helps the

plan and

scene rank higher .

No swing there are

leaning towards

to

licit complaints on there, but how to

justly

descent it out? Anyone can

well-deserved up with on there and

declaim relative to anything they can of of (with no

responsibility) because a

spring wouldn't

suffer them to

afford uncivilized a outcome

after the stated renounce

period .

The hotelier "Ed" pulls in a

quota of

readies from donations (purge with

while it's not a

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion company is "Ripoff Mark into Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't know how it's explained on the

ordering, but businesses look on been charged $50,000 and more with a

witness this

"appointment". It's

from a to z a

substantial scam actually .

Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not

gifted develop their own

gripe removed or edited
.

The ripoffreport.com purlieus isn't

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a

clever scam,

but it's beyond question a scam .

There are some ways in which the

responsibility

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to abundant as

kindly as they do, so if things tick away fully they'll wake up to that. This

determine be less of an

issuing when Google stops giving them so much

clout in the search results .

Cheese-paring the

character, I con where people did experiments

and tried to mail "reports" on the

quarter

savagely

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at all times approved .




 

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. 2001-2009, © Copyright ModernGhana.com

ModernGhana.com is part of Modern Ghana Media Communication Limited and NigeriaFilms.com